हम किसीसे कम नहीं
Dir. Nasir Hussain
« January 2014 | Main | March 2014 »
हम किसीसे कम नहीं
Dir. Nasir Hussain
Posted at 08:00 AM in 1970s, Commerical hits in India, Great naach-gaana, Masala, Timepass | Permalink | Comments (5)
|
Dir. Maneesh Sharma
It is difficult to gauge the success of a movie if you cannot discern what it set out to do. Shuddh Desi Romance ("proper Indian romance") might want to be yet another manchild-finds-maturity-through-love tale. It might be aiming for tart, frank commentary on modern - read, sexual - relationships between young people And it might be, as its title suggests, a straight-up romance. The muddle of all these narrative approaches yields a movie that is, unfortunately, confused and unenengaging.
Moreover, Shuddh Desi Romance commits the same error as Wake Up Sid - it teases us with an interesting, agentive female character, and then expends most of its time and focus on the far less compelling young man in the story. Gayatri (Parineeti Chopra) lives alone, supports herself, and forms (and ends) relationships on her own terms. Raghu (Sushant Singh Rajput) is mostly a horny dumbass; reasonable minds can perhaps differ on how cute and charming a horny dumbass is as a filmi hero - the industry sure thinks audiences love them - but I've had more than my fill of the archetype, thanks very much.
Trudging out yet another clueless manchild instead of developing an actual character is the least of Shuddh Desi Romance's missteps, though. When Gayatri leaves Raghu's life for a while, the narrative remains with Raghu. Eventually, of course, Gayatri returns to the story - but we aren't shown what she does during that time. How much stronger this movie would have been, had it followed the trajectories of both characters. Each of them begins with a warped view of love - Raghu's simplistic and idealized, Gayatri's damaged and cynical. Shuddh Desi Romance at least attempts to show how Raghu's attitude toward love changes. (At least, that is a reasonable guess at what it's getting at with his lurching from relationship to relationship. None of the narrative is especially coherent.) The film should have examined Gayatri too, her backstory, and the time during her absence. Instead, it tries sleight-of-hand, substituting the depiction of sexual liberation for actual narrative substance. Gayatri doesn't need a personality - she's a totemic Modern Girl. You can almost hear the filmmakers congratulating themselves.
With this focus on Raghu, this film once again turns a romance story into a story about a boy - and he is a boy with no depth at all. His flailing about with Tara (Vaani Kapoor), the inexplicable girlfriend at the other vertex of the inevitable triangle, ranges from dull to painful to watch. Raghu rebounds, and then rebounds from his rebounds, all the while sure that this time he's really In Love (TM). Tara's motivations are even less clear. At first she seeks revenge against Raghu for jilting her early in the film, but then she falls for him for real. Tell me you've never heard that trope before - and tell me it makes any sense at all. As is so often the case in films like this, one is left to wonder what not just one but two seemingly intelligent and free-thinking woman see in this overgrown twelve-year-old.
Shuddh Desi Romance isn't all bad. Despite the characters' unusual, and weird and unexplained, disconnect from any friends or family, both Gayatri and Raghu have a father figure in the jolly Goyal (Rishi Kapoor). Kapoor continues to have the time of his life in supporting roles like Goyal, and it is a pleasure to watch him laugh and chew scenery and give bemused, affectionate advice to the film's confused principals. There is also occasionally trenchant commentary on love and heartbreak, delivered by the characters in fourth-wall-breaking sessions chatting with the camera, in the style of reality-show redux. These are cute, and together with Kapoor's scenes, are Shuddh Desi Romance at its best. There are also some sweepingly beautiful shots of Jaipur, the film's unusual setting. The story as a whole, though, is a slapdash, jumbled treatment. The tale's shallowness would be forgivable if it were one of several vignettes in an ensemble movie like Salaam-e-ishq. On its own, though, there is not enough coherence to convey any depth of meaning, and not enough substance to satisfy.
Posted at 07:46 AM in 2010s, Timepass, WTF? | Permalink | Comments (13)
|
Dir. Brahmanand Singh
About ten years ago, before I ever watched a Hindi movie, I bought a CD called The Rough Guide to Bollywood - a brief compilation of hits spanning five decades. I had been interested in pop music from all over the world for some time, and often turned to the Rough Guide series when I wanted to explore something new to me. I had at that time only heard classical Indian music, and did not know what to expect from this CD. I loaded the music onto my MP3 player and took off for work. Then, I had a religious experience.
The first song on the CD was R.D. Burman's legendary "Dum maaro dum." By the time Asha Bhosle's first few notes danced into my ears, my entire musical universe was blown open. I had never heard anything like this before, such a mind-blowing bend of Indian sounds with western. The song is just two and a half minutes long, and in that brief time, I was hooked. I listened to the tune over and over again before I even got to the rest of the compilation.
I do not have the vocabulary to put into words just what it was about "Dum maaro dum" that made an instant fan out of me. Fortunately, in Brahmanand Singh's documentary Pancham Unmixed - Mujhe chalte jaana hai, you can hear from lots of folks who do. In interviews with R.D. Burman's contemporaries, colleagues, and friends, the film paints a vivid picture of Burman's personality and process. Even better than that, though, are the interviews with the new generation of music directors so profoundly influenced by Burman's innovations. These are deliciously technical. It is a treat to hear the likes of Shankar Ehsaan and Loy, Shantanu Moitra, and Ismail Darbar talk shop about what made Burman's music so different, unleashing their tabla bols and losing themselves in contemplation of Burman's rhythms and melodies.
The interviews with Burman's contemporaries are fascinating as well. Musicians who worked with him, such as Bhupinder Singh, Louis Banks, Pyarelal Sharma, and of course Asha Bhosle, describe his composition process and give a fascinating view into his prolific and creative mind. Kavita Krishnamurthy speaks reverently about his direction, the way he gently extracted exactly the performance he wanted from his singer. Many more - Gulzar, Shammi Kapoor, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, and others - weigh in to praise Burman's skill as a composer and warmth as a friend.
Indeed, there is no shortage of effusive praise in this film, which is however somewhat light on biographical details and very light on criticism. Pancham Unmixed tells a few stories from Burman's life, but the focus is always on his music. Asha Bhosle describes meeting him for the first time when she was working with his father; he was then a skinny boy of fifteen eager to soak up every bit of music that he could. But the film does not even mention their marriage, some twenty-five years later.
Likewise for any less than reverent commentary on Burman's work. R.D. Burman is, fairly or not, infamous for generous borrowing of melodies from foreign sources. Most of these uses are inarguably transformative, and many were done at the insistence of directors or producers, so to mention them is not an automatic indictment of Burman or his creativity. Nevertheless, any overview of Burman's career should at least address them head-on. Pancham Unmixed errs a little too far on the side of coyness, mentioning this aspect of Burman's fame but sweeping it under the rug with an embarrassed smile - Usha Uthup's embarrassed smile, to be exact, as she dismisses any question of originality with the tired old assertion that no music is ever truly original.
Then again, Pancham Unmixed does not really make any pretense to objectivity - it is a paean, a eulogy, and a tribute, and as such, it need not dwell on anything other than praising and reverently memorializing the legend of its subject. Viewed in that light, it is a terrific watch for anyone who appreciates classic Hindi cinema and its music. And since the music of R.D. Burman was, for me, the overture to a great adventure with both, the affectionate memories of a score of Hindi cinema's greatest artists makes for a very enjoyable story indeed.
Pancham Unmixed is available for rent or download from iTunes and a few other online services as well.
Posted at 12:30 PM in 2000s, Art films | Permalink | Comments (4)
|
हँसी तो फँसी
Dir. Vinil Mathew
Before I launch into gushing praise for Parineeti Chopra - and believe me, I am fully sold on this fearless, appealing young actor - there is something else that needs to be said about Hasee toh phasee ("she smiled, so she's snared").
I would wager that when Sidharth Malhotra was a boy, he wanted to be Shah Rukh Khan when he grew up. He clearly studied him hard, practiced the moves, executes them faithfully during song sequences. He has the tight-lipped dimple-forcing smile down cold. He can reproduce that playful arch-the-eyebrow, bobble-the-head swoony smile when dancing with a pretty girl. He arches his back and flings his arms at just the right angle. But there is a crucial difference between his Nikhil in Hasee toh phasee and Khan's romantic heroes: Nikhil is a nice guy. Not a smarmy, arrogant jerk with an alleged heart of gold. Not a stalker or a deceiver, not full of himself, not dripping with confidence that all he has to do is stand there and wait while the girl-du-jour runs trembling into his arms. Nikhil is just a genuinely sweet fellow trying hard to do the right thing.
Nikhil is different from many more recent romantic heroes, too. He is not a man-child in need of the taming influence of a more mature partner, like Ranbir Kapoor so often renders (e.g. Yeh jawaani hai deewani, Wake Up Sid). He is not sullen and too serious, waiting for a manic-pixie-dream-girl savior to teach him how to loosen up, like Shahid Kapoor in Jab We Met. Nikhil doesn't have all his stuff together - his business ventures are false starts that leave him begging for funding in increasingly bold ways - and he has an overdeveloped sense of loyalty that keeps him stuck to his fiancee Karishma (Adah Sharma), never responding in anger even when she says unconscionably cruel things to him. But Nikhil is unusually calm, genuine, and sweet for a filmi hero. You don't have to dig past any grating boys-will-be-boys personality traits to find the creamy center. That fact alone makes Hasee toh phasee refreshing and pleasant.
Enter Meeta (Parineeti Chopra), a socially inept, chemically altered, peculiarly intelligent woman, and indeed the unlikeliest filmi heroine. Meeta is damaged in a variety of ways, some more vaguely specified than others. She may have a history of drug abuse - the characters who make this assertion might not be the most reliable interpreters of her behavior - but at any rate she is, in the film's present, dependent upon a cocktail of antidepressants that she prescribes herself. Forgery, kleptomania, and financial shenanigans all appear on her resume, but Meeta is also evidently a brilliant, if unconventional, chemical engineer. This is sort of the character who, usually, is at best a comic sideplot, the heroine's weirdo college friend - but here, she is the lead.
She is also profoundly lonely. In exile from her family and her country for seven years, Meeta is starved for compassion. She has suffered verbal abuse that is so intense as to be hard to watch, shredded by an overbearing uncle while other family members look on; no one stands up for her (until finally someone does). These scenes exemplify the sneaky richness of Hasee toh phasee, the moments in which it conveys a great deal in a relatively subtle way. Though it only happens twice during the film, the non-response of Meeta's family members suggest that this uncle's verbal sledgehammer threatens all of them with some frequency, bullying them into silence. And it helps explain a little of Meeta's symptomized peculiarity.
In short, Meeta is a character with a whole lot going on. And Parineeti Chopra internalizes this many-tentacled beast of a backstory, rendering a performance that is vulnerable, sincere, and extremely appealing. Chopra throws herself into such unconventionally weird and likeable characters with great fearlessness, and it makes her an actor I want to see again and again. She showed it in Ladies vs. Ricky Bahl and shows it again here: a willingness to sacrifice glamor for the sake of telling a good story about a very interesting young woman.
Nikhil is all but overwhelmed by Meeta's weird intensity, compelled by compassion and affection to take care of her, offering her the friendship and sympathy she obviously craves without understanding that need herself. And likewise, Sidharth Malhotra is all but overwhelmed by Parineeti Chopra. Whether attributable to good direction or his instincts as an actor - it is hard to know which, in just his second film - Malhotra has the good sense to get out of Chopra's way, to let Meeta be the bigger personality. Malhotra gets first billing but Hasee toh phasee is Parineeti Chopra's movie.
And it is successful; often funny, often very touching, with just the right mixture of humor and yeh-shaadi-nahin-ho-sakti type melodrama. It is not without warts; Chopra's nervous tics might be a little overdone for some tastes, and the pace flags a little bit in the last third. The technobabble around Chopra's engineering project is a little silly, and Nikhil's quest for funds is perhaps not that well thought out. But these are, for me, small quibbles with a film that is a solid effort for first-time director Vinil Mathew. It advances the territory staked by the likes of Jab We Met and Band baaja baaraat, a satisfying exemplar of a newer breed of romance with substantive female leads and male leads displaying traits other than manic energy or unaccountable arrogance. I'm ready for more.
Posted at 07:02 AM in 2010s, Very good (but not favorite) | Permalink | Comments (22)
|
साहिब बीबी और गुलाम
Dir. Abrar Alvi
When I visited Calcutta late last year, I enjoyed a historical walking tour through the northern neighborhood that was once the center of the city's great Babu culture. Calcutta's Babus amassed great wealth while serving the colonial government through the 19th century. They also established some of the defining literary and artistic traditions of Calcutta. And in the sunset of their era, the early 20th century, some of them quite famously squandered their wealth, taking their pursuits to hedonistic extremes.
My tour took me into a crumbling, collonaded courtyard that had once been the grand cloister of a Babu's mansion. Sahib bibi aur ghulam ("master, wife, and servant") opens in the ruins of just such a space. The backdrop of this lovely film is, indeed, the decline of the great Calcutta culture of the Babu. The household of the Chaudhary brothers, Majhle Sarkar (D.K Sapru) and Chhote Sarkar (Rehman) evokes the stories I heard on my tour about Chhatu Babu and Lalu Babu; like these real-life emblems of Babu excess, the Chaudhary brothers host pigeon races and stage elaborate wedding celebrations for their cats. By the film's end, the Chaudharys have squandered it all, yet they cling to their rituals of hedonism; in one scene one of the brothers sits in a grand parlor empty of all rugs, art, and furnishings - except for his hookah.
All of this gaudy grandeur is shown through the everyman perspective of a young bumpkin called Bhootnath (Guru Dutt). Bhootnath arrives fresh from the countryside, gawping in disbelief at the vastness of the Chaudhary household, at the ceaseless bustle of its comings and goings, at the very idea of women not hidden in purdah. Guru Dutt plays Bhootnath broadly, wide-eyed and open-mouthed, but also very winningly. The film hints at some of the major social changes of the time, such as the growing nationalist movement or influential new religious philosophies. But these notions are kept fairly vague, just out of sharp focus, as they would be to the childlike Bhootnath even as he moves in their swirling midst. There is a sweetness to Bhootnath that stops just short of being cloying.
Posted at 10:04 PM in 1960s, Commerical hits in India, Very good (but not favorite) | Permalink | Comments (11)
|
Recent Comments